Interject

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Apple, is in fact, Foxconn/Apple, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Foxconn plus Apple. Apple is not an company unto itself, but rather another authority governing an independently functioning Foxconn system made useful by the Foxconn core production, repressive utilities and vital system components comprising a full production and distribution process as defined by the law of the USA. Many computer users run a modified version of the Foxconn system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Foxconn which is widely used today is often called “Apple”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Foxconn system, developed by the Foxconn Project. There really is a Apple, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Apple is the logo: the symbol on the case that allocates the machine’s aestetic and cultural signal to the other individuals that you encounter. The logo is an essential part of a social system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete device. Apple is normally used in combination with the Foxconn hardware: the whole system is basically Foxconn with Apple added, or Foxconn/Apple. All the so-called “Apple” distributions are really distributions of Foxconn/Apple.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Arch, is in fact, Arch Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Arch plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

I'd just like to interject for a moment about the difference between GNU/Arch Linux and GNU/Autism.
What you're referring to as GNU/Arch Linux, is in fact, GNU/Autism, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU/Autism plus GNU/Arch Linux. GNU/Autism is not an mental disease unto itself, but rather another GNU/Libre component of a fully complete GNU/Autism's symptons, made useful by the GNU/Window Managers packages in GNU/pacman repositories, GNU/AUR and vital autism components comprising full autism symptons as defined by unixporn. Many edgy kids run a modified version of the Autism system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Autism system which is widely used today is often called “Arch Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Autism system, developed by the Autistic GNU/Developers. There really is a Arch Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Arch Linux is a modified version of the Linux kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Arch Linux is normally used in combination with the Autism operating system: the whole system is basically Autism with Arch Linux added, or GNU/Autism. All the so-called “Arch Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Autism.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Berlin, is in fact, Brandenburg/Berlin, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Brandenburg plus Berlin. Berlin is not a Bundesland unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Brandenburg system made useful by the Brandenburg Landtag, Städte and CDU comprising a full Bundesland as defined by the Verfassung. Many ladies run a modified version of the Brandenburg system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Brandenburg which is widely used today is often called “Berlin”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Brandenburg system, developed by the Brandenburg Project. There really is a Berlin, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the Deutschland they use. Berlin is the Stadt: the program in the Staat that allocates the Staat’s resources to the other GELD. The Stadt is an essential part of an Deutschland, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete Bundesland. Berlin is normally used in combination with the Brandenburg Bundesland: the whole system is basically Brandenburg with Berlin added, or Brandenburg/Berlin. All the so-called “Berlin” distributions are really distributions of Brandenburg/Berlin.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree firmware blobs.
Nonfree firmware programs used with the kernel, are called "blobs", and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance, the term "blob" means something else: a nonfree driver. OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called "projects" by BSD developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions "contain no blobs", it causes a misunderstanding. They are not talking about firmware blobs.
No BSD distribution has policies against proprietary binary-only firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers.

I'd like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as calculus is, in fact, real analysis, or as I've recently taken to calling it, (R, +, ×, ≤, |·|, τ = {A ⊆ R | ∀ x ∈ A, ∃ ε > 0, ]x − ε, x + ε[ ⊆ A}, ∩^{A σ-algebra of R, τ ⊆ A} A, ℓ)-analysis. Calculus is not a branch of mathematics unto itself, but rather another application of a fully functioning analytic system made useful by topology, measure theory, and vital R-related properties comprising a full number field as defined in pure mathematics. Many students and researchers use applications of real analysis every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the application of real analysis which is widely used today is often called "calculus", and many of its users are not aware that it is merely a part of real analysis. There really is a calculus, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of what they are using. Calculus is the computation process: the set of rules and formulae that allow a mathematician or scientist to derive expressions for derivatives and integrals. The computation process is an essential part of a branch of mathematics, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete number field. Calculus is normally used in combination with the real number field, its topology and its measure space: the whole system is basically real numbers with analytical methods and properties added, or real analysis.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. If you want to describe a feeling of comfort and satisfaction, by all means say you are "content," but using the word as a noun to describe written and other works of authorship adopts an attitude you might rather avoid. It regards these works as a commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money. In effect, it disparages the works themselves.
Those who use this term are often the publishers that push for increased copyright power in the name of the authors ("creators," as they say) of the works. The term "content" reveals their real attitude towards these works and their authors. (See Courtney Love's open letter to Steve Case and search for "content provider" in that page. Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the term "intellectual property" is also biased and confusing.)
However, as long as other people use the term "content provider", political dissidents can well call themselves "malcontent providers".
The term "content management" takes the prize for vacuity. "Content" means "some sort of information," and "management" in this context means "doing something with it." So a "content management system" is a system for doing something to some sort of information. Nearly all programs fit that description.
In most cases, that term really refers to a system for updating pages on a web site. For that, we recommend the term "web site revision system" (WRS).

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as God, is in fact, Yahweh, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, YHWH. God is not a being unto itself, but rather another interpretation of a character from Israelite religion, reinterpreted over the centuries by Judaist and Christian philosophers and theologians . Many religious people worship a reinterpreted version of the Israelite YHWH character every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of YHWH which is widely worshipped today is often called “God”, and many of its worshippes are not aware that it is basically the god of air and war, first worshipped by ancient israelites. There really is a character of God, and these people are worshipping it, but it is just a later reinterpretation of the ancient fable. God is a retelling of the ancient religious stories through the lens of changing philosophy and civilization: the being in the world that creates everything that exists, and allocates the world’s resources to beings. The God is an inspiring concept, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete religiophilosophical system. God is normally worshipped in combination with his son Jesus Christ of Nazareth: the whole being is basically YHWH with Jesus, and the Holy Spirit added, or The Holy Trinity. All the so-called "God" worshippers are really worshippers of YHWH.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. Please avoid using the term “google” as a verb, meaning to search for something on the internet. “Google” is just the name of one particular search engine among others. We suggest to use the term “web search” instead. Try to use a search engine that respects your privacy; DuckDuckGo claims not to track its users, although we cannot confirm this.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. What you're reffering to as a merchant, is in fact, a filthy JEW. The Jew is ummunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, merchant, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back. "I've been found out."
Despite making up less than 1% of the global population, the Jews control over 50% of the world, and the media. The Jews made up 95% of the Soviet government, and committed mass genocide against whites, claiming that they were enforcing atheist policies, yet the Jews try to make the holocaust the center of attention, even though the Holocaust didn’t happen.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as New York, is in fact, GNU/York, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus York. New York City itself is not a state unto itself, but rather another bureaucratic component of a fully functioning GNU government made useful by the 2nd-circut court, a state senate and vital state representatives comprising a full state as defined by the US constitution. Many citizens live in a modified version of the GNU state without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the state of GNU which is widely used today is often called "New York City," and many of its citizens are not aware that it is basically the GNU state, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a New York (City) and these people live in it, but it is just a part of the state they populate. New York City is the the tourist attraction: the city in the state that allocates citizens, New York City-style pizza and foreigners to the other programs (e.g. businesses, government bodies and non-profits) that you run. The tourist attraction is an essential part of a state, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete governing body. New York City is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with New York City added, or GNU/York. All the so-called "subdivisions" of New York City are really counties of GNU/York.

I'd like to interject for just one moment:

What you’re referring to as Pokémon, are in fact Ingress/Pokémon, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Pokémon plus Go. Pokémon are not game unto themselves, but rather another component of a fully functioning Game Freak franchise made useful by the Nintendo corporation, Niantic geolocation databases, and pocket computers comprising a full video game franchise as defined by Hillary Clinton and John Hanke.

Many Pokémon trainers run a modified version of the Ingress system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Ingress which is widely used today is often called “Go”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the same geolocation system also developed by Niantic.

There really are Pokémon, and these trainers are catching them all, but it is just a part of the system they use. Pokémon are the characters: the creatures and species that you catch in your pokéballs. The characters are an essential part of any franchise, but useless by themselves; they can only function in the context of a complete augmented reality experience. Pokémon are normally used in combination with the Ingress portal database: the whole system is basically Pokémon with Go added, or Ingress/Pokémon. All the so-called “Pokémon” trainers are really agents of Ingress/Pokémon.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as piracy, is in fact, prohibited filesharing, or as I've recently taken to calling it, sharing with your neighbour. Prohibited filesharing is not a crime unto itself, but rather another piece of propaganda of a dysfunctional media industry propagated by publishers and harmful laws like the DMCA.

Many computer users make unauthorized copies everyday, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the act which is widely performed today is often called "piracy", and many of the people who do it are not aware that it is basically sharing information with your neighbour, and not stealing.

There really is piracy, and some people are doing it, but it is just robbery at sea. Piracy is an act of theft: an action at sea in which goods are forcefully transferred from one ship to another. Piracy is important to be aware of, but unrelated to unauthorized copying; it can only occur at sea. Piracy is not normally used in combination with unauthorized copying - the two acts are typically separate. All the so-called piracy on the internet is really just sharing with your neighbour.

I'd just like to interject for a moment about the difference between pedophilia and statutory rape
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as pedophilia, is in fact, statutory rape,or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, unconsentable sexual action . Pedophilia is not a crime unto itself, but rather one of the various possible causes of committing the crime of statutory rape. Through a peculiar turn of events, the crime which is committed by having sex with a person under the age of consent is often called “pedophilia”, and many of its users are not aware that pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder, not a legal term. There really is pedophilia, and some of the people committing the crime have it, but it is a psychiatric disorder. Pedophilia might be the core cause of it: the disorder in the human mind that causes the person to feel sexual arousal towards prepubescent children. The pedophilia is common though not essential to commit the crime, but not dangerous itself; it's the crime of statutory rape that offenders can be charged for. All the so-called “pedophilia” crimes are really crimes of statutory rape.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. Red Hat's enterprise distribution primarily follows the same licensing policies as Fedora, with one exception. Thus, we don't endorse it for the same reasons. In addition to those, Red Hat has no policy against making nonfree software available for the system through supplementary distribution channels.

I'd just wike to intewject fow a moment. What you'we wefewing to as winux, is in fact, GNU/winux, ow as I've wecentwy taken to cawing it, GNU pwus winux. winux is not an opewating system unto itsewf, but wathew anothew fwee component of a fuwy functioning GNU system made usefuw by the GNU cowewibs, shew utiwities and vitaw system components compwising a fuw OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computew usews wun a modified vewsion of the GNU system evewy day, without weawizing it. Thwough a pecuwiaw tuwn of events, the vewsion of GNU which is widewy used today is often cawed "winux", and many of its usews awe not awawe that it is basicawy the GNU system, devewoped by the GNU Pwoject.

Thewe weawy is a winux, and these peopwe awe using it, but it is just a pawt of the system they use. winux is the kewnew: the pwogwam in the system that awocates the machine's wesouwces to the othew pwogwams that you wun. The kewnew is an essentiaw pawt of an opewating system, but usewess by itsewf; it can onwy function in the context of a compwete opewating system. winux is nowmawy used in combination with the GNU opewating system: the whowe system is basicawy GNU with winux added, ow GNU/winux. Aw the so-cawed "winux" distwibutions awe weawy distwibutions of GNU/winux.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. What you're referring to as She, is in fact, He, or as I've recently taken to calling it, TITS OR GTFO.
In real life, people like you for being a girl. They want to fuck you, so they pay attention to you and they pretend what you have to say is interesting, or that you are smart or clever. On the Internet, we don't have the chance to fuck you. This means the advantage of being a "girl" does not exist. You don't get a bonus to conversation just because I'd like to put my cock in you.
When you make a post like, "hurr durr, I'm a girl" you are begging for attention. The only reason to post it is because you want your girl-advantage back, because you are too vapid and too stupid to do or say anything interesting without it. You are forgetting the rules, there are no girls on the Internet.
The one exception to this rule, the only way you can get your "girlness" back on the Internet, is to post your tits. This is, and should be, degrading for you, and admission that the only interesting thing about you is your naked body.

I'd just like to interject for one moment. What you're referring to as shit, is in fact, Rat/Shit, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Rat's log log. Shit is not a synonym for bad, but rather one of the greatest things to ever be done by man. Many people call things they dislike shit, without realizing that without shitting, they themselves could not live. One example of a man who appreciates shit properly can be found at https://write.midov.pl/rat

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to appreciate systemd. The design sense is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of the wicked garbage that goes in to running a PC the way people expect, the decisions will go over the typical user's head. There's also Lennart's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Upstart, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these design decisions, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about PCs. As a consequence people who dislike systemd truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Lennart's decision to use an "an INI-like configuration language," which itself is a cryptic reference to Microsoft's Windows. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Lennart Poettering's genius wit unfolds itself on their computer screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
And yes, by the way, i DO have a systemd tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that theyr'e within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid